From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jul 13 21: 4:15 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from pzero.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca (pzero.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca [209.151.24.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE8314DC5 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 21:04:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca) Received: from morden.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pzero.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA00563; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 23:46:46 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199907140346.XAA00563@pzero.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, tech-userlevel@netbsd.org Subject: Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) In-reply-to: Your message of "13 Jul 1999 14:58:54 PDT." <87673oyzxd.fsf@redmail.redback.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 23:46:45 -0400 From: Michael Richardson Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG is there some reason why whether or not to overcommit can't be a kernel compile time option? Or that a process can signal its desire to not get SIGKILL by registering a non-default SIGDANGER (which we'd have to create) handler ala AIX? ] Train travel features AC outlets with no take-off restrictions| firewalls [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[ ] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[ ] panic("Just another NetBSD/notebook using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message