Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 12:27:32 +0200 (EET) From: Evren Yurtesen <yurtesen@turkey.ispro.net.tr> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: When to transition to 3.0-STABLE.. NOT NOW! Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990128122136.2426B-100000@turkey.ispro.net.tr> In-Reply-To: <82789.917504214@zippy.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hello, I am using 3.0-RELEASE and I was wanting to upgrade to 3.0-STABLE because 3.0-RELEASE gives error messages about calcru blah blah.. and I could not find the option about calcru that is in FAQ so I should upgrade to 3.0-STABLE now! because my processes are dying randomly (when I saw RELEASE at 3.0 I thought it would be stable though now I see that even when it says STABLE it is not stable ? cool ) is there a possibility that I just rebuild kernel with new sources ? and I do not upgrade all other binaries? would it work ? how else may I overcome this calcru stuff ? Evren On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > If you're running 3.0-RELEASE or 2.2.x-SOMETHING and you're thinking > of upgrading to 3.0-STABLE at this time, I thought I would just send a > quick heads-up which says simply: "Don't!" > > Please wait until at least mid-February, when the release engineering > and general tree repair work for 3.1-RELEASE has been mostly completed > and all the sharpest edges have been filed off. This work has to > happen anyway for 3.1 and it will make the transition process MUCH > easier, so please... Wait! Don't jump in now just because we > recently branched and you see a new -stable, wait until the early > bleeders have finished finding the sharp edges in the upgrade process > and we've had a chance to child-safe the whole thing a bit. > > Folks who've been tracking 3.0 all along and went to ELF everything > months or weeks ago are fine and should keep right on tracking > 3.0-stable, it's just that for the rather NEW situation where we have > people switching binary formats as they jump -stable tracks, we're not > quite prepared yet. This is a very different upgrade than previous > ones and we need time to make the "upgrade" target actually work in a > reasonable number of cases. What works great for 3.0-RELEASE might > not at all for 2.2-stable and vice-versa, so it's not as easy as it > looks. > > By mid-February, those running 2.2-S will be more encouraged to take > the plunge since they'll have both a working source upgrade target AND > a working SNAPshot or two to do binary upgrades with. We haven't even > had the SNAPshots happening reliably since we branched and anyone who > jumps in right now and doesn't also have the time to necessarily > wrestle with a very green process simply does so at their own peril. > > You have been warned! > > - Jordan > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.990128122136.2426B-100000>