From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 9 20:50:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ED3116A4DD; Wed, 9 Aug 2006 20:50:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@flat.berklix.net) Received: from thin.berklix.org (thin.berklix.org [194.246.123.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BBBD43D49; Wed, 9 Aug 2006 20:50:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhs@flat.berklix.net) Received: from js.berklix.net (p549A652B.dip.t-dialin.net [84.154.101.43]) (authenticated bits=128) by thin.berklix.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k79KnwfX012226; Wed, 9 Aug 2006 22:50:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@flat.berklix.net) Received: from fire.jhs.private (fire.jhs.private [192.168.91.41]) by js.berklix.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k79Knuc3033186; Wed, 9 Aug 2006 22:49:57 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@flat.berklix.net) Received: from fire.jhs.private (localhost.jhs.private [127.0.0.1]) by fire.jhs.private (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k79Knu1N089081; Wed, 9 Aug 2006 22:49:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@fire.jhs.private) Message-Id: <200608092049.k79Knu1N089081@fire.jhs.private> To: "Jin Guojun [VFFS]" In-Reply-To: Message from "Jin Guojun [VFFS]" of "Wed, 09 Aug 2006 13:34:27 PDT." <44DA46D3.3040504@lbl.gov> Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 22:49:56 +0200 From: "Julian H. Stacey" Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Real and available memory? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 20:50:07 -0000 > Well, that's where the missing 40 meg is. :) The kernel text (including > any modules and preloaded mfsroot's) aren't include in the 'avail memory' > count. > > > > This is not where the memory goes.
> The MFS root is probably not allocated yet at this point.
Sounded about the right size though, & was nice to think John had found the answer :-) Krassimir could test the assertion by adjusting the mfsroot size a bit, rebooting, & observing dmesg change & reporting back, would be interesting to know for sure. -- Julian Stacey. Unix & C Consultant, Munich / Muenchen http://berklix.com Mail in Ascii, not HTML. Ihr Rauch = mein allergischer Kopfschmerz.