From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 2 10:10:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 262D6106564A; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:10:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E2778FC12; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:10:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mB2A9sQ8014853; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:09:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id mB2A9rMV014850; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:09:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:09:53 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Ivan Voras In-Reply-To: <9bbcef730812020120w539a8f14jc496b14c2fbd52ad@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20081202110922.T14849@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <200812010959.15647.kirk@strauser.com> <4934E276.3050308@comcast.net> <9bbcef730812020120w539a8f14jc496b14c2fbd52ad@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Nathan Lay , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Disenchanted with ZFS; alternatives? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 10:10:13 -0000 > >> What about DragonFlyBSD's new HAMMER FS? I hear it has similar capabilities >> as ZFS without the overhead. Though, strangely, I haven't really heard >> anyone discuss it even though it was released some months ago. it's maybe pre-pre-prerelease. it's not finished yet.