From owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Mar 11 12:11:06 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7F13916A4CE; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:11:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A8AB843D2F; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:11:05 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2BKAsD3053046;
	Thu, 11 Mar 2004 21:10:56 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:03:56 PST."
             <Pine.BSF.4.21.0403111202000.87340-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> 
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 21:10:54 +0100
Message-ID: <53045.1079035854@critter.freebsd.dk>
cc: current@freebsd.org
cc: small@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: "nanobsd" prototype 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-small@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems <freebsd-small.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-small>,
	<mailto:freebsd-small-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-small>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-small@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-small-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-small>,
	<mailto:freebsd-small-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 20:11:06 -0000

In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0403111202000.87340-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>, Ju
lian Elischer writes:
>
>
>On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>>
>[...] 
>> 	mkdir /usr/src/nanobsd
>[...]
>> 
>> Feedback of all sorts most welcome!  And more documentation
>> to arrive as it gets written.
>
>wouldn't it make sense to put nanoBSD in release alongside picoBSD?
>(that still leaves us microBSD and milliBSD :-)

As I understand it picoBSD has never managed the 4.x->5.x transition
and is scheduled to be removed if nobody starts paying attention
to it soon.

re@/scottl@ asked me to not put nanobsd in src/release as they would
prefer it be kept for the "official release" stuff only, and to
me src/tools actually makes a lot more sense after all.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.