From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jun  8 16:40:48 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6014237B401
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Sun,  8 Jun 2003 16:40:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sccrmhc11.attbi.com (sccrmhc11.attbi.com [204.127.202.55])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFA7643FA3
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Sun,  8 Jun 2003 16:40:47 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from DougB@freebsd.org)
Received: from master.dougb.net
	(12-234-22-23.client.attbi.com[12.234.22.23](untrusted sender))
	by attbi.com (sccrmhc11) with SMTP
	id <2003060823404601100bkrfte>; Sun, 8 Jun 2003 23:40:46 +0000
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2003 16:40:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org>
To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>
In-Reply-To: <20030602224734.GC1345@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>
Message-ID: <20030608164005.X5603@znfgre.qbhto.arg>
References: <20030602171942.GA87863@roark.gnf.org>
	<xzp4r3844eb.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
	<xzpznl02nry.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
	<20030602214956.GG87863@roark.gnf.org>
	<20030602224734.GC1345@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>
Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/
X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore!
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Making a dynamically-linked root
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2003 23:40:48 -0000

On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:

> I suggest we get the functionality in without actually changing the
> default. We can change the default anytime after that when we are
> confident that we covered everything and have understanding of the
> overall impact of switching...

I strongly support this position, for whatever that's worth.

Doug

-- 

    This .signature sanitized for your protection