From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Feb 3 08:58:23 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id IAA15975 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 3 Feb 1995 08:58:23 -0800 Received: from ess.harris.com (su15a.ess.harris.com [130.41.1.251]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id IAA15969 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 1995 08:58:22 -0800 Received: from borg.ess.harris.com (suw2k.ess.harris.com) by ess.harris.com (4.1/SMI-4.0) id AA04669; Fri, 3 Feb 95 11:58:16 EST Received: by borg.ess.harris.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA02232; Fri, 3 Feb 95 11:56:26 EST Date: Fri, 3 Feb 95 11:56:26 EST From: jleppek@suw2k.ess.harris.com (James Leppek) Message-Id: <9502031656.AA02232@borg.ess.harris.com> To: freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: PPPD, 2.0R, lcp-echo Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I have enabled the lcp-echo stuff and no crashing occurred, of course it did not work either, but I suspect it was because my provider does not support the echo. I have noticed on other systems running 2.0R that they like to reboot a fair amount when using ppp (I am running current), It looks like its tied to the routing tables somehow. I once added 2 default routes to my system then did a pppdown and "pop", time for a bathroom break, a reboot occurs. Jim > From owner-freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com Fri Feb 3 11:35:36 1995 > Date: Fri, 3 Feb 1995 08:50:37 -0500 > From: starkhome!gene@sbstark.cs.sunysb.edu (Gene Stark) > To: Joe Greco > Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org > Subject: PPPD, 2.0R, lcp-echo > Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org > > >Is anybody out there using lcp-echo's with pppd under 2.0R? I've got a > >situation where a questionable pair of modems is occasionally locking up, > >apparently some sort of flow control problem, and I'd like to enable > >"lcp-echo-request" and "lcp-echo-failures", but when I do, the system panics > >almost instantly (probably during the first echo). > > > >The remote end is a terminal server known to support lcp-echo requests. > > > >Is anyone doing it? Or am I smoking bad weed again? :-) > > I tried this the other day, and ran into the same problem. Didn't get > a chance to look into it. Have at it! > > - Gene Stark >