From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Dec  3 13:00:33 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA11485
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 3 Dec 1996 13:00:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from etinc.com (et-gw-fr1.etinc.com [204.141.244.98])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA11479;
          Tue, 3 Dec 1996 13:00:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ntws (ntws.etinc.com [204.141.95.142]) by etinc.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id QAA04772; Tue, 3 Dec 1996 16:02:17 -0500
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19961203155907.00b8ea00@etinc.com>
X-Sender: dennis@etinc.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 1996 15:59:09 -0500
To: Joe Greco <jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com>
From: dennis <dennis@etinc.com>
Subject: Re: TCP/IP bandwidth bragging
Cc: dyson@freebsd.org, lm@neteng.engr.sgi.com, thorpej@nas.nasa.gov,
        davem@jenolan.rutgers.edu, jkh@time.cdrom.com, kpneal@pobox.com,
        hackers@freebsd.org, torvalds@cs.helsinki.fi, lm@relay.engr.SGI.COM,
        iain@sbs.de, sparclinux@vger.rutgers.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>
>> You've heard the old saying: numbers
>> talk, bullshit walks.

Yes, but bullshit numbers fool only fools.

anyone who uses both knows the truth, so whats to argue about?

Dennis