From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 27 09:19:58 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4643437B401 for ; Tue, 27 May 2003 09:19:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net (stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96E0A43F3F for ; Tue, 27 May 2003 09:19:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from user-2ivfjqj.dialup.mindspring.com ([165.247.207.83] helo=mindspring.com) by stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19KhB2-0005TA-00; Tue, 27 May 2003 09:19:52 -0700 Message-ID: <3ED38FE1.D8379F6C@mindspring.com> Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 09:18:41 -0700 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Kabaev References: <20030527123541.GG5269@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> <20030527084529.7d441299.kabaev@mail.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: b1a02af9316fbb217a47c185c03b154d40683398e744b8a458446e6c37d4d5a8faf669a4690469913ca473d225a0f487350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: policy on GPL'd drivers? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 16:19:58 -0000 Alexander Kabaev wrote: > Wilko Bulte wrote: > > Yes, see for example the GPL_ed floating point emulator. Aside: I thought the license had been changed on this? > I and no doubt many others will insist on keeping GPLed drivers out of > the tree. I have no objections for this drivers to be confined in ports > though. So will anyone with lawyers who wants to distribute a precompiled kernel binary. Since the console will work without the driver statically compiled into the kernel, a kernel module is really the best course of action for something like this, so that a kernel with, for example, licensed proprietary ISDN drivers, or the proprietary licensed OSS sound drivers, can still use the driver without a license conflict. Remember that's it's legal to to distribute seperate binaries, as long as you comply with the GPL for the GPL'ed binary, but it's a violation of clause 6(b) of the GPL to combine them into one binary and distribute them, if you are legally obligated to not give out the source code for the non-GPL'ed portion. And since the only thing that gives you the right to use the code in the first place is the license... -- Terry