Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 23:50:17 -0500 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> To: i18rabbit@cwazy.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions <questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: lame w/o lame Message-ID: <20040706045016.GP6574@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <200407060427.i664Rw44049020@en26.ai1.anchorage.mtaonline.net> References: <200407060427.i664Rw44049020@en26.ai1.anchorage.mtaonline.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Jul 06), i18rabbit@cwazy.co.uk said: > what happened to the 'lame' package? it's not in the FBSD packages. > can someone stick it in the packages, or state why it shouldn't be a > package? Shipping a binary mp3 encoder requires a license from Thomson. Read about it at http://www.mp3licensing.com/ -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040706045016.GP6574>