From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 10 21:17:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E6BA16A401 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 21:17:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from raven.customer.vol.cz (raven.customer.vol.cz [195.250.144.108]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F0FC13C47E for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 21:17:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.0.23] (r3b159.net.upc.cz [213.220.193.159]) (authenticated bits=0) by raven.customer.vol.cz (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l2ALHZEo022241 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 10 Mar 2007 22:17:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) From: Pav Lucistnik To: Ade Lovett In-Reply-To: References: <45F1DDE2.5030404@FreeBSD.org> <45F1EA6A.6070904@FreeBSD.org> <20070310023034.c5939c48.jylefort@FreeBSD.org> <7CF1749C-3254-46AC-ABDD-BAB0D84ED7A1@FreeBSD.org> <45F2546F.60401@FreeBSD.org> <45808CB8-07C8-4680-A11D-8982BD8A6B52@FreeBSD.org> <45F272E6.9070501@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-UGgHm0wtyByImdebLCHE" Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 22:17:35 +0100 Message-Id: <1173561455.17911.24.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Spam-Score: -2.104 () AWL,BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.61 on 195.250.144.108 X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: raven.customer.vol.cz; Sender-ip: 213.220.193.159; Sender-helo: [192.168.0.23]; ) Cc: Doug Barton , freebsd ports Subject: Re: Ports 104877 causing big problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 21:17:44 -0000 --=-UGgHm0wtyByImdebLCHE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ade Lovett p=ED=B9e v so 10. 03. 2007 v 01:22 -0800: > As for the second issue, I am still waiting for positive empirical =20 > evidence that the remedy is not in fact worse than the cure. To =20 > date, unlike the gnucash/libltdl issue, where it was obviously =20 > documentable that the previous method of doing things was broken, I =20 > have seen no evidence to support 'fixing' things. It's bit more than just about startup speed. The issue at hand is, that the indirect dependencies of libgpg-error gets embedded into all the libraries/binaries, and we don't bump PORTREVISION on all these ports when we update the libgpg-error port. =46rom reading your other replies, I get the impression you would be more comfortable with bumping PORTREVISION on all the cups+ ports'. --=20 Pav Lucistnik You can't expect to wield supreme executive power just 'cause some watery tart threw a sword at you. --=-UGgHm0wtyByImdebLCHE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBF8yBuntdYP8FOsoIRAss2AKCxnuAPUJMJZnt2rDa/ZKAlQ64CZgCguEPc 3C+DIBoxuIpCYY7df+S0oNQ= =9L4f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-UGgHm0wtyByImdebLCHE--