Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 1 Dec 2006 09:26:56 +0100
From:      "Adri Koppes" <adrik@salesmanager.nl>
To:        "Hajimu UMEMOTO" <ume@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   RE: FreeBSD Port: milter-greylist-2.0.2
Message-ID:  <CE801F9B7EC9514483E599C74702777D07FDA5@ntserver4.salesmanager.nl>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

If 3.1.1 is still the development release, I agree the last stable 3.0
would be the choice for the port.
However it seems the current port maintainer (aragorn+ports@babasse.net)
is unavailable, since email bounces.
It would be nice to upgrade the port, but without a maintainer that
would be difficult.

Best regards,

Adri.
=20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hajimu UMEMOTO [mailto:ume@FreeBSD.org]=20
> Sent: donderdag 30 november 2006 17:43
> To: Adri Koppes
> Cc: aragorn+ports@babasse.net; ports@FreeBSD.org
> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: milter-greylist-2.0.2
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> >>>>> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:40:52 +0100 "Adri Koppes"=20
> >>>>> <adrik@salesmanager.nl> said:
>=20
> adrik> The current port of milter-greylist is more then 1 year old.
> adrik> Do you have any plans to update the port to the newer=20
> 3.1.1 release?
>=20
> 3.1.1 is develepment release, and you shouldn't think it=20
> stable.  3.0 is better for port, IMHO.
>=20
> Sincerely,
>=20
> --
> Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan=20
> ume@mahoroba.org  ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org http://www.imasy.org/~ume/
>=20



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CE801F9B7EC9514483E599C74702777D07FDA5>