From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 30 10:24:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E908E106564A for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:24:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from onemda@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f162.google.com (mail-fx0-f162.google.com [209.85.220.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BAB08FC21 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:24:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from onemda@gmail.com) Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so1716007fxm.43 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 03:24:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=bQkNt6ERd8MYICA0Hxn67JsWRLkvgmLzKOXupIiHJsE=; b=Ch7kEGwAXljn32qsygYQuZ1fYR9U+xVAUG007RxQJTW76kFu7JbHQ5uFsRsBaEn7aK vUCtHzsO9NPZPC0yTX6RvHDYrHoywV+9gI9TPeMjm1QsuCv5lxYf9MpwyxAwACnk6RPv 8rFPBq7k/aunIG8xsmrRBpl1Hs81Nn6Yol8qE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=PR0tu/BAX75UtK0S3acasq1eDjUuL7QYT5QRv+9SCLeF2gHapvtddaWcOmcFVdLXgg kPVbE2VoLTqDWcdfNSd7zp9HCzk/9ZSKsKwmraKKhW1AECiKi5msAZflCvryAVH+B8yE YZ72iUJY2JB31CjTvtwvuRiMLBjbtxxL0JXr4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.179.141 with SMTP id d13mr77517hbg.124.1241087044448; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 03:24:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <49F9799F.7090601@entel.upc.edu> References: <49F4B018.1000703@entel.upc.edu> <3a142e750904300256w4218f71bwfee97cdd1eb8252f@mail.gmail.com> <49F9799F.7090601@entel.upc.edu> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:24:04 +0200 Message-ID: <3a142e750904300324n11458adaic8e656694ae95f24@mail.gmail.com> From: "Paul B. Mahol" To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gustau_P=E9rez?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Signal sensitivity problem with if_rum X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:24:06 -0000 On 4/30/09, Gustau P=E9rez wrote: > >>> I think this is right place to post, if it is not, please let me know= . >>> >> It is not usb fault, it is driver side fault. >> >> > Thank you. I thought it was not an usb fault, because with stable > (old usb stack) it shows the same behaviour. > > I posted here because I saw some posts this April related to rum and > because it was not current's fault. Perharps freebsd-net would be a > better place to post. > >> I use ndisgen(8) in such case(...), note that only CURRENT now have >> usb support for ndisulator. >> >> > Well, already tried (current csup'ed this week). No luck (no AP's > available, nothing), and removing the modules gave a nice panic :) Please explain that in detail as much as possible and send bt from panic. On i386 ndisulator with usb works fine last time I tested it, I am aware of= bugs on amd64 ... --=20 Paul