From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 14 16:14:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A70E516A41F for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:14:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582A243D67 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:14:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jBEGDSZX051115; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 10:13:53 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <43A0449E.4050405@daleco.biz> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 10:13:18 -0600 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051026 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Barniskis References: <439F3E96.5090101@ntlworld.com> <20051213215647.GA27582@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20051213233143.GB27219@holestein.holy.cow> <43A0305C.9050405@scls.lib.wi.us> In-Reply-To: <43A0305C.9050405@scls.lib.wi.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Off-Topic X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:14:41 -0000 [moving to chat@, as it really *is* getting pretty OT] Greg Barniskis wrote: > Pietro Cerutti wrote: > >> I'm for this one: >> >> The best way to accellerate a computer running Windows is at 9.81 m/s^2 >> >> by Roland >> >> It's wonderful! > > > I concur. Physics is fun (I know, I'm sick), so I'd add to that: > > For best results, continue until the PC's speed exceeds 11.2 km/s. > > 8D I'm not a physicist, but shouldn't we also specify a vector/direction in this case? Granted, something more than half of all possible vectors should work, apart from tall buildings, trees, etc., .... KDK -- We read to say that we have read.