From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Dec 1 15:07:17 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA04914 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 1 Dec 1996 15:07:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA04909 for ; Sun, 1 Dec 1996 15:07:15 -0800 (PST) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id PAA08406; Sun, 1 Dec 1996 15:48:17 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199612012248.PAA08406@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: Lex/Yacc question To: stesin@gu.net (Andrew Stesin) Date: Sun, 1 Dec 1996 15:48:17 -0700 (MST) Cc: terry@lambert.org, peter@taronga.com, hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from "Andrew Stesin" at Nov 30, 96 01:22:43 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > On Fri, 29 Nov 1996, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > > Because of RFC1341/RFC1342 syntax extensions. > > > Do you mean RFC#1521/RFC#1522 ? (The ones you noticed are obsolete, > AFAIK). Yes. But, of course, I want to be able to use a switch to set compliance level, actually, so 1341/1342 are included. Didn't 1341 describe the EHLO mechanism, still in use? Was that part superceded as well? Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.