From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 19 14:09:46 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBC24FB8; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:09:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF73F13AE; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:09:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=0ST5EYSHMqLXy3uaNLDz6R1L6D6JYtJubCVRBlY/UQs=; b=AX9u74MhLuk25jWurDxxtYBIdyrku+NqXUbU8rhURKMydfz2L1Omy2pNC4g+DJ/MmvM1q0aoUnMOHcVX6Fy2nO9gOFfFxHO9koKwko7l82smBnzV98dN/rI2RgqQsnllXywumhs/7RXqr0hWEMNA3SG8i0WfYe2pGR6hIspiTZk=; Received: from [120.174.176.138] (port=16458 helo=X220.alogt.com) by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (SSLv3:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1VteIK-003VeT-NW; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 07:09:45 -0700 Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 22:09:16 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky To: Rodrigo Osorio Subject: Re: If ports@ list continues to be used as substitute for GNATS, I'm unsubscribing Message-ID: <20131219220916.0b5fbde5@X220.alogt.com> In-Reply-To: <20131219134641.GA5264@oldfaithful.bebik.local> References: <52B0D149.5020308@marino.st> <20131219135421.63d7cd20@X220.alogt.com> <52B2EECA.10908@marino.st> <20131219214150.4dd55b09@X220.alogt.com> <20131219134641.GA5264@oldfaithful.bebik.local> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id: erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: David Demelier , "ports@FreeBSD.org" , marino@freebsd.org, freebsd.contact@marino.st X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:09:46 -0000 Hi, On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:46:41 +0100 Rodrigo Osorio wrote: > On 19/12/13 21:41 +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:04:10 +0100 > > John Marino wrote: > > > > > On 12/19/2013 06:54, Erich Dollansky wrote: > > > > you got the point. We have to assume that a port which is not > > > > marked broken has to work. > > > > > > I build the entire port tree several times a month. I can tell > > > you from experience that this assumption is not valid. > > > > so, you want to say, that all the little problems which are solved > > mainly by people who are not the maintainer should become PRs? > > IMHO, it's the only way to reach quality in the port tree with a very > accurate traceability. you want to say i.e. all the e-mails regarding the switch to KMS supported X should be PRs just because the writer did not read UPDATING and the other sources? I think that this can easily handled here without any PR. Erich