From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 12 19:42:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 646AB106564A; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 19:42:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhellenthal@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ACCF8FC12; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 19:42:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn33 with SMTP id 33so4938468iwn.13 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 12:42:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:x-openpgp-key-id:x-openpgp-key-fingerprint :x-openpgp-key-url; bh=S+gAYEuqikvz7Uq4c2ASQuCOlkXjX7FygWJ8pHYX+aI=; b=Z7O6KxafMHEuirrLNksn+PyJ1aXnk8wfupokjY4ep5v4DdEU6IcwlWTD7PmhyvJMVO XgjS8oRVIGO5XhAHIXAB6RmBkScl7rF6lz+e8o4/g/DFjWCtDIOx47y+laBtM8TMv3uS CXY5FA1kLHfHpCJc7ctVhjndzhwx8F0cw6V/A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :x-openpgp-key-id:x-openpgp-key-fingerprint:x-openpgp-key-url; b=qZLthhSX5YzZnIvJPZ3PrLWkyix0AGyMLGo/ardCQ0nH6FYR+RRGm+heR1uWUbPqAA wA+EBx7U7vr6uoyX3KsyBsaeNUfu+wvxTW9sspIYzusGvUKZly/GGm2EbUCnjDcFV8NJ PJFVC0QcHPG3M2dwzQx9D+ZLjaaCCCLhr3VOo= Received: by 10.42.139.137 with SMTP id g9mr6072153icu.46.1307907762206; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 12:42:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DataIX.net (adsl-99-181-139-216.dsl.klmzmi.sbcglobal.net [99.181.139.216]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r1sm3257040icz.2.2011.06.12.12.42.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 12 Jun 2011 12:42:41 -0700 (PDT) Sender: "J. Hellenthal" Received: from DataIX.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by DataIX.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5CJgbQb046784 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:42:38 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhell@DataIX.net) Received: (from jhell@localhost) by DataIX.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p5CJgbE1046783; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:42:37 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhell@DataIX.net) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:42:37 -0400 From: Jason Hellenthal To: Gary Palmer Message-ID: <20110612194237.GD15184@DataIX.net> References: <4DF3E98B.40108@FreeBSD.org> <20110612085649.GA11503@DataIX.net> <4DF49181.1000007@entel.upc.edu> <20110612185631.GA15184@DataIX.net> <20110612192440.GB37735@in-addr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XvKFcGCOAo53UbWW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110612192440.GB37735@in-addr.com> X-OpenPGP-Key-Id: 0x89D8547E X-OpenPGP-Key-Fingerprint: 85EF E26B 07BB 3777 76BE B12A 9057 8789 89D8 547E X-OpenPGP-Key-URL: http://bit.ly/0x89D8547E Cc: Doug Barton , Gustau P?rez , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc.d script to load kernel modules X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jhell@DataIX.net List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 19:42:43 -0000 --XvKFcGCOAo53UbWW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 03:24:40PM -0400, Gary Palmer wrote: > On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 02:56:31PM -0400, Jason Hellenthal wrote: > > So technically here a ZFS only install is lacking the speed in which > > modules are loaded. I would prefer to find out why and fix that before > > we go about adding new functionality to rcNG. >=20 > As I believe Doug has already said, its not just loading modules from ZFS. > In my experience, loading modules via loader.conf from UFS on i386 is > significantly slower than once the kernel has booted on both of my systems > here. I think I've tried it and its not a disk thing as its slow loading= from > flash media also. >=20 Yes I agree. I was just stating that simply for the previous post implying where ZFS was slower than UFS. I would believe there is some sort of memory restriction or constraint or some sort of routine that is preventing them from being loaded nearly as fast as when the kernel is already fully loaded. This to me seems like a worthwhile problem looking into if it can be fixed. --XvKFcGCOAo53UbWW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) Comment: http://bit.ly/0x89D8547E iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJN9RatAAoJEJBXh4mJ2FR+g4oH/RusNbT76rrgsJ22gpdOgHPc VtZsqfG7tTik4HiDzyrYs9kBVparXMXioD2mmYEd2JDLIlKsl1gpn34IzxMNvYX+ 2Q44oeTm5/4l7IftRdZ7Xdi4WNcUkqzZqC+pkXWugf09SWZi6QOo2aXDHPEURHx2 N83sga7zPRQ1fcMG3qRfaEDPLWWK+zAZqSW+gsMXtQueysHZw5AlkBwTfwgKXEvd snehI/O5Z12RRi7dOtItInijacYZLncr58t8FnKF867pOZCcHGNbOJiGakqTINRl yJwWCJuZa7t704OxsbaN5vf5yjvewL7r0BRLzEceFw6Pj3yJd/I+dzl14add+Ks= =m1FC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XvKFcGCOAo53UbWW--