From owner-freebsd-git@freebsd.org Sun Feb 21 03:53:22 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-git@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF8B547913 for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 03:53:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (static-24-113-41-81.wavecable.com [24.113.41.81]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "ultimatedns.net", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Djry95KPzz3QfW for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 03:53:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTP id 11L3rAnS082660; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 19:53:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 19:53:10 -0800 From: Chris To: Ilya Bakulin Cc: Christian Weisgerber , freebsd-git@freebsd.org Subject: Re: got(1) in base (was: Re: gitup(1) in base) In-Reply-To: References: <49046db6-88d9-d59d-85f5-ecc1321b07c6@siemens.com> User-Agent: UDNSMS/17.0 Message-ID: <2f2261c230f5549a355f8533937c19db@bsdforge.com> X-Sender: bsd-lists@bsdforge.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Djry95KPzz3QfW X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11404, ipnet:24.113.0.0/16, country:US]; local_wl_ip(0.00)[24.113.41.81] X-BeenThere: freebsd-git@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of git use in the FreeBSD project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 03:53:22 -0000 On 2021-02-20 11:24, Ilya Bakulin wrote: > Last time I asked this question I didn't receive any convincing reply so > I'd like to try again... What exactly does "makes base system > complete" mean? What's wrong with having a good port? Define good. IOW ask 9 people what is long. Then ask 9 people what is short. You don't expect to get the same answer, do you? ;-) As to; makes base system complete? It used to mean that it had everything required to make a fully functional system. What's wrong with having a good port? Nothing. Everyone can get their "good port" installed as simply as pkg install good port. :-) > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 7:15 PM Christian Weisgerber > wrote: > >> "Uni T. Runker": >> >> > Using the portable version as a base for FreeBSD makes sense to me. >> > >> > However, Christian did a lot of work to make got run on FreeBSD. >> Christian >> > - what's your opinion on this? >> >> Well, I created the existing devel/got port. It identifies all >> portability issues that concern FreeBSD and solves them. It should >> be the obvious starting point for an import into base. >> >> I'll happily contribute to get a "-portable" effort to build on >> FreeBSD eventually, but that's orthogonal to importing got into >> base. >> --Chris