From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 5 13:40:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4A2B16A4A0; Tue, 5 Dec 2006 13:40:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from gaia.nimnet.asn.au (nimbin.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.45.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD9043CEB; Tue, 5 Dec 2006 13:31:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (smithi@localhost) by gaia.nimnet.asn.au (8.8.8/8.8.8R1.4) with SMTP id AAA00832; Wed, 6 Dec 2006 00:31:50 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 00:31:49 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: "Marc G. Fournier" In-Reply-To: <20061205113837.DD7AD16A618@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSDStats Report for December 1st, 2006 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 13:40:59 -0000 On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 "Marc G. Fournier" wrote: [..] > report_devices sends the output of pciconf -l | grep -v none (active devices) Marc, I've wondered for a while why you're excluding 'none' devices, eg on my Compaq Armada 1500c (recent 5.5-STABLE) 'pciconf -lv' includes none0@pci0:8:0: class=0x030000 card=0xb1010e11 chip=0x00c0102c rev=0x64 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Asiliant (Chips And Technologies)' device = '69000 AGP/PCI Flat Panel/CRT VGA Accelerator' class = display subclass = VGA which is not exactly an inactive device here? While at it, I'm finding the release stats rather confusing, mixing in all of the various release versions of various *BSDs. Having used FreeBSD since 2.2, I have a fair idea which of those numbers are likely not FreeBSD versions, and even an inkling of which OS some of the others might be, but many mightn't know which were apples and which oranges. Perhaps they'd be more useful summarised by OS, or at least prefaced with 'f' or 'o', 'n', 'd' or something else indicative? Just an idea .. Cheers, Ian