From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 9 12:25:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE18106566C for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 12:25:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrej@brodnik.org) Received: from svarun.brodnik.org (www.brodnik.org [193.77.156.167]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D92918FC0C for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 12:25:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.34.108] (prevod.fri1.uni-lj.si [212.235.188.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by svarun.brodnik.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 599D44B2BD for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 14:12:26 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4FFACB51.90001@brodnik.org> Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 14:15:13 +0200 From: "Andrej (Andy) Brodnik" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org References: <4FF2E00E.2030502@FreeBSD.org> <86bojxow6x.fsf@ds4.des.no> <89AB703D-E075-4AAC-AC1B-B358CC4E4E7F@lists.zabbadoz.net> <4FF8C3A1.9080805@FreeBSD.org> <0AFE3C4A-22DB-4134-949F-4D05BBFC4C6C@lists.zabbadoz.net> <4FF8CA35.7040209@FreeBSD.org> <4FF952FB.10200@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 12:48:10 +0000 Subject: Re: Replacing BIND with unbound (Was: Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 12:25:04 -0000 Excuse my ignorance - but is there a how-to paper on transition from bind to unbound for SOHO? Thanx and LPA On 12-07-09 12:55 PM, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote: > On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Doug Barton wrote: >> Unbound has different policies and release schedules that are more in >> line with ours. So in the short term (as in, the next few years) we're >> better off with unbound in the base. > Where is there information about this / what is their support? When I > looked at their website I found nothing about security support, branch > handling etc. and nobody has replied to that part in these threads > (unless I missed it - I just rescanned thread without seeing a reply). > > -- > Simon L. B. Nielsen > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"