From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun 15 20:14:09 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CBAC106566C;
	Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:14:09 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from stefan@fafoe.narf.at)
Received: from viefep15-int.chello.at (viefep15-int.chello.at [62.179.121.35])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A9778FC1B;
	Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:14:07 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from stefan@fafoe.narf.at)
Received: from edge02.upc.biz ([192.168.13.237]) by viefep19-int.chello.at
	(InterMail vM.7.09.01.00 201-2219-108-20080618) with ESMTP
	id <20090615195426.SSKJ8900.viefep19-int.chello.at@edge02.upc.biz>;
	Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:54:26 +0200
Received: from lizard.fafoe.narf.at ([213.47.85.26])
	by edge02.upc.biz with edge
	id 4KuQ1c01r0a5KZh02KuRzN; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:54:26 +0200
X-SourceIP: 213.47.85.26
Received: by lizard.fafoe.narf.at (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 02ACDBABD; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:54:23 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:54:23 +0200
From: Stefan Farfeleder <stefan@fafoe.narf.at>
To: Sam Leffler <sam@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20090615195422.GB1418@lizard.fafoe.narf.at>
Mail-Followup-To: Sam Leffler <sam@freebsd.org>,
	Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org
References: <20090615181555.GA52009@freebsd.org> <4A369529.5090004@freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4A369529.5090004@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Cc: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [RFC]: (void)0 instead of empty defines
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:14:09 -0000

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:38:33AM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
> 
> Are you saying that:
> 
> if (cond)
>    ;
> 
> is considered worthy of a warning by the compiler?  Is it just "if" or all 
> conditional control constructs (e.g. while)?
> 
> I can image many instances of this construct arising from debugging 
> facilities.  This sounds like a stupid restriction and I would argue we 
> should just disable the warning.

GCC warns too with -Wextra.