Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:46:41 -0400 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: =?UTF-8?B?0JHQvtGA0LjRgSDQodCw0LzQvtGA0L7QtNC+0LI=?= <bsam@passap.ru> Cc: Ports FreeBSD <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: huge distfiles policy Message-ID: <CAF6rxg=_j6Tw51musYVknB3fUH6b5hr27iHXWJz-UzKsVrHTBA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5066F61C.5050704@passap.ru> References: <5066F61C.5050704@passap.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 29 September 2012 09:22, =D0=91=D0=BE=D1=80=D0=B8=D1=81 =D0=A1=D0=B0=D0= =BC=D0=BE=D1=80=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BE=D0=B2 <bsam@passap.ru> wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm about to commit print/texlive ports (PR/171571). One of it's ports > (print/texlive-texmf) has size approx. 1.4 Gb. > > What is the current policy upon huge ports? Should I restrict someting > to not build at, say, pointyhat? Something else? I believe others have set MANUAL_PACKAGE_BUILD=3D huge though I'm not certain if this is because the distfile is large, or the final package is large (although in this case both are true) --=20 Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxg=_j6Tw51musYVknB3fUH6b5hr27iHXWJz-UzKsVrHTBA>