From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org  Wed Jul  5 15:03:34 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AFD9DAD0D1
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Wed,  5 Jul 2017 15:03:34 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E287E83AA6
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Wed,  5 Jul 2017 15:03:33 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v65F3Xug010853
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 15:03:33 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 220313] Uses/fortran.mk: Support fortran:flang argument to use
 devel/flang instead of gfortran
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 15:03:33 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Ports Framework
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: feature, needs-qa
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: db@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: Open
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-220313-13-O1oJJ8Zrv6@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-220313-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-220313-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 15:03:34 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D220313

--- Comment #7 from Diane Bruce <db@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Tijl Coosemans from comment #6)
I've noted this possibility to emaste as well. As discussed at last Dev Sum=
mit
in June it also matters muchly if we continue the path of a faux libgcc or
rename it.

If the entire toolchain for orts has to be chosen a priori then we might wa=
nt
to rename our base libgcc to something else entirely.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.=