From owner-freebsd-current Fri Dec 11 03:29:04 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA21529 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Fri, 11 Dec 1998 03:29:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from sraigw.sra.co.jp (sraigw.sra.co.jp [202.32.10.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA21524 for ; Fri, 11 Dec 1998 03:29:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from furuta@sra.co.jp) Received: from sramhc.sra.co.jp (sramhc [133.137.20.31]) by sraigw.sra.co.jp (8.8.7/3.6Wbeta7-sraigw) with ESMTP id UAA26502; Fri, 11 Dec 1998 20:28:36 +0900 (JST) Received: from sramhc.sra.co.jp (furuta@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sramhc.sra.co.jp (8.8.7/3.6Wbeta7-srambox) with ESMTP id UAA26264; Fri, 11 Dec 1998 20:28:50 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <199812111128.UAA26264@sramhc.sra.co.jp> To: mike@smith.net.au Cc: y-nakaga@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp, nate@mt.sri.com, nathan@rtfm.net, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PAO Integration? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 10 Dec 1998 18:10:04 -0800" References: <199812110210.SAA00665@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.70 on Emacs 19.28.7 / Mule 2.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 20:28:50 +0900 From: Atsushi Furuta Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I am Atsushi Furuta, a member of the newcofig. >> In article <199812110210.SAA00665@dingo.cdrom.com>, Mike Smith writes: > Much of the work that you still have to do on > the newconfig stuff has already been done. For example, itojun-san's point of Date: Tue, 09 Jun 1998 13:21:42 +0900 From: Jun-ichiro Itoh Subject: new config Message-ID: <9929.897366102@cardamom.itojun.org> - Cannot pass "flags" field to pci devices. - Having foo_softc[NFOO] is A BAD THING, thinking about pci/isapnp devices. We must avoid this. is not implemented in the current FreeBSD. Many dirty ISA hack such as static softc, isa_devtab_wdc, is still holded. The newconfig cleard up much of them. Our stance is that such problems should be cleared up as soon as possible. It seems to me that the roadmap is not intended to solve these problem. For me, the newconfig is only a step to do so. BTW, I agree with Cho-san's opinion. I want to discuss with new-bus poeple to solve these problem. Please tell me about the new-bus ML. It is first time that I hear the new-bus ML. -- furuta@sra.co.jp (Atsushi Furuta) Advanced Technology Group. Software Research Associates, Inc. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message