Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 19:08:02 -0400 From: "Mikhail T." <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: office@freebsd.org Subject: Re: boost-libs and CXXFLAGS (Re: devel/boost-bjam) Message-ID: <518D7DD2.9080507@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <20130510225928.GT91136@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <518066A5.6090601@aldan.algebra.com> <20130501181311.GW3577@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <5181885A.1030501@aldan.algebra.com> <20130502210136.GG79495@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <5182D5C9.4000004@aldan.algebra.com> <20130502215048.GI79495@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <5182E531.8050109@aldan.algebra.com> <20130502222115.GL79495@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <518D5850.4020802@aldan.algebra.com> <518D73DF.6070302@aldan.algebra.com> <20130510225928.GT91136@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10.05.2013 18:59, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> for fPIC I know that in a place, I don't remember which part it wasn't set
> correctly so imho it needs to stay.
Well, both boost-libs and boost-python-libs built fine (9.1/amd64, g++48) here
without the fPIC. LibreOffice still building...
I think, it was added some time ago, when boost had a bug and omitted the -fPIC,
where it was needed. That was in 2005:
http://lists.boost.org/boost-build/2005/06/10034.php
Since then the bug was fixed and the flag is no longer necessary.
> (I add problems during the exp-run)
Uhm, does this mean, you'll consider it once the exp-run confirms, it is safe?
It can certainly wait until then...
> For the rest approved, but please add a comment saying that boost prefers -O3.
>
> If you want to join the office team so that you don't need any approval for
> those fixes, well you are welcome in:) just add yourself to the wiki page.
Thank you, I'll think about it.
-mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?518D7DD2.9080507>