From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 14 00:10:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884DB16A536 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:10:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E4813C45A for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:10:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m1E0A3Ro010925 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:10:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m1E0A3gv010924; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:10:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:10:03 GMT Message-Id: <200802140010.m1E0A3gv010924@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org From: Yuri Cc: Subject: Re: docs/120566: ifconfig(8) doesn't recognize 'inet' command when setting up wireless card X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Yuri List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:10:09 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/120566; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Yuri To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, yuri@tsoft.com Cc: Subject: Re: docs/120566: ifconfig(8) doesn't recognize 'inet' command when setting up wireless card Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:07:44 -0800 Doesn't it make more sense to have a freedom in the order of keywords? Seems like logically for the most part order doesn't matter. Maybe 'ifconfig' should be fixed instead being more intelligent and applying all supplied arguments no matter what order they are supplied?