From owner-freebsd-net Wed Dec 1 18:24: 3 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from prism.flugsvamp.com (prism.flugsvamp.com [208.139.222.230]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF32014A2B for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 18:24:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jlemon@prism.flugsvamp.com) Received: (from jlemon@localhost) by prism.flugsvamp.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA68155; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 20:23:34 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from jlemon) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 20:23:34 -0600 From: Jonathan Lemon To: Archie Cobbs Cc: David Greenman , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: interaction between Nagle's algorithm and TCP delayed ACKs Message-ID: <19991201202334.A68139@prism.flugsvamp.com> References: <19991201104305.D67400@prism.flugsvamp.com> <199912020032.QAA45401@bubba.whistle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i In-Reply-To: <199912020032.QAA45401@bubba.whistle.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Dec 01, 1999 at 04:32:05PM -0800, Archie Cobbs wrote: > Does anyone else agree with my (mostly theoretical) claim that > the delayed ACK time should not be a global constant, but rather > somehow roughly proportional to the estimated RTT?? In theory, I think that it sounds promising. I also suspect that an optimal delayed ack time may also be a function of the congestion window, but that's more of a feeling than a solid theory. -- Jonathan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message