From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 11 08:05:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60F36106567A for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:05:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C8848FC2A for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:05:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KzoFv-00078t-0C for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:05:47 +0000 Received: from 58.85-200-255.bkkb.no ([85.200.255.58]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:05:46 +0000 Received: from solskogen by 58.85-200-255.bkkb.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:05:46 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Christer Solskogen Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:05:38 +0100 Lines: 11 Message-ID: References: <20081110145952.GA72821@icarus.home.lan> <20081111003234.GA83329@icarus.home.lan> <20081111074043.GA91207@icarus.home.lan> <20081111080233.GA91743@icarus.home.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 58.85-200-255.bkkb.no User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Macintosh/20080914) In-Reply-To: <20081111080233.GA91743@icarus.home.lan> Sender: news Subject: Re: High load - lost network X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:05:48 -0000 Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > Simply put: I don't know. Based on the polling(4) man page, it might > improve things for you, but your ATA high interrupt rate problem will > still exist even if you use polling(4). > Okay. Thanks for taking time helping me :) -- chs