From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Nov 6 23:46:43 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id XAA09174 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 6 Nov 1996 23:46:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au (rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au [129.78.129.109]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id XAA09169 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 1996 23:46:36 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dawes@localhost) by rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au (8.6.11/8.6.9) id SAA09872 for hackers@freebsd.org; Thu, 7 Nov 1996 18:46:32 +1100 From: David Dawes Message-Id: <199611070746.SAA09872@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au> Subject: Why multiple distfiles directories on ftp.freebsd.org? To: hackers@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 7 Nov 1996 18:46:32 +1100 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I'm about to re-organise and upgrade the FreeBSD mirror I maintain ({ftp,sup}.au.freebsd.org), and when checking the space requirements I see that there are two large distfiles directories. One is /pub/FreeBSD/distfiles (> 660MB), and the other is /pub/FreeBSD/FreeBSD-current/ports/distfiles (> 490MB). It seems that the latter is (with a very small number of exceptions) a subset of the former. Is there a good reason for having so much of this duplicated? I keep the former in sync with ftp mirroring, and the latter with sup. I presume that the latter will no longer be available anyway when I switch over to cvsup (and I'll be providing cvsup.au.freebsd.org when that is done). David