Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:20:16 +0300 From: Alex Kozlov <spam@rm-rf.kiev.ua> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, spam@rm-rf.kiev.ua Subject: Re: Make process title - % complete Message-ID: <20091019162016.GA96201@ravenloft.kiev.ua>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 05:51:42PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: > 2009/10/19 Alex Kozlov <spam@rm-rf.kiev.ua>: > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 04:35:08PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: > >> >> if nobody objects, I'll commit it :) > >> > > >> > I seem to recall that setproctitle() is quite expensive to call; perhaps > >> > it would make sense offer a flag to prevent make(1) from calling it? [1] > >> > > >> > Anyway, the feature looks nice! I'd like to have it... > >> > > >> > [1] I'm unsure how expensive it is compared to fork(1)-ing etc; I'd > >> > expect it's negligable but who knows... > >> > >> The loop it's called in is not processed bazillion times per second > >> (though it *is* called surprisingly often; small, fast jobs can result > >> in somewhere in the order of magnitude of 100 iterations per second on > >> a fast CPU). As you said - I expect it's negligable compared to fork() > >> and the work jobs themselves do. > > How about add this statistic to make info handler? > You mean SIGINFO? Yes -- Adios
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091019162016.GA96201>