From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 26 18:11:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D87E16A403 for ; Tue, 26 Dec 2006 18:11:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Sylvie.Dupuy@ccr.jussieu.fr) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE8B13C481 for ; Tue, 26 Dec 2006 18:11:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Sylvie.Dupuy@ccr.jussieu.fr) Received: from moka.ccr.jussieu.fr (moka.ccr.jussieu.fr [134.157.1.23]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.13.7/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id kBQHKTeY052024 for ; Tue, 26 Dec 2006 18:20:29 +0100 (CET) X-Ids: 164 Received: from localhost (sd@localhost) by moka.ccr.jussieu.fr (8.10.0/jtpda-5.3.3) with ESMTP id kBQHKS83620994 for ; Tue, 26 Dec 2006 18:20:28 +0100 Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 18:20:28 +0100 (NFT) From: Sylvie DUPUY To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.164]); Tue, 26 Dec 2006 18:20:30 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.5/2380/Tue Dec 26 13:11:33 2006 on shiva.jussieu.fr X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Miltered: at shiva.jussieu.fr with ID 459159DD.003 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! Subject: trunk on re0 interface X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 18:11:42 -0000 Hi, I got a FreeBSD (6.1) connected to a Cisco switch 2950 (12.1). The speed on the re0 interface is 100 Mbps full duplex but when it get connected to the Cisco it turns out 10baseT half-duplex ? I can create VLAN attached to this interface, and this seems to work but is there anyway to speed up the tagging process ? (ifconfig tells this interface does hardware tagging) Any hint about this ? Thanks a lot, Sylvie