From owner-freebsd-fs Thu Oct 3 09:07:29 1996 Return-Path: owner-fs Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA05343 for fs-outgoing; Thu, 3 Oct 1996 09:07:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dyson.iquest.net (dyson.iquest.net [198.70.144.127]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA05325; Thu, 3 Oct 1996 09:07:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from root@localhost) by dyson.iquest.net (8.7.5/8.6.9) id LAA00894; Thu, 3 Oct 1996 11:07:01 -0500 (EST) From: John Dyson Message-Id: <199610031607.LAA00894@dyson.iquest.net> Subject: Re: nbuf in buffer cache To: dfr@render.com (Doug Rabson) Date: Thu, 3 Oct 1996 11:07:01 -0500 (EST) Cc: dyson@freebsd.org, karpen@ocean.campus.luth.se, bde@zeta.org.au, heo@cslsun10.sogang.ac.kr, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from "Doug Rabson" at Oct 3, 96 03:06:09 pm Reply-To: dyson@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-fs@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > It would be nice if instead of marking the buffer for a later commit, the > underlying pages could be marked instead. This would be tricky to fit > into the existing vnode system though. > We can do that in the current vfs_bio, modulo some bugs. I probably won't get to it until the NEXT big release -- my 2.2/3.0 plate is so full, that it is spilling over (mixed metaphor, I think :-)). John