From owner-freebsd-current Wed Apr 5 11:44:21 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 991BF37BB24 for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 11:44:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id LAA79634; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 11:43:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 11:43:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <200004051843.LAA79634@apollo.backplane.com> To: Brad Knowles Cc: Mathew Kanner , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Vinum breakage References: <200004051344.JAA15337@dean.pc.sas.com> <200004051606.JAA78646@apollo.backplane.com> <20000405123724.A24249@cs.mcgill.ca> <200004051649.JAA78992@apollo.backplane.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG : :> Also, as a general note to everyone, make sure you are building vinum :> into the kernel directly and not using it as a kld, just to ensure that :> it stays in sync with the kernel. : : Isn't this in direct conflict with the instructions given for :normally using vinum? Is this a temporary change, until we get over :some of the current problems, or is this a more permanent change? : : Out of curiosity, is this your recommendation, or does Greg agree with it? This is my personal recommendation - if you are messing around with something that is under development or test, it is best to build it into the kernel to avoid getting out of sync without knowing it. -Matt Matthew Dillon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message