From owner-cvs-all  Tue Jul 18  0:38: 6 2000
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from axl.ops.uunet.co.za (axl.ops.uunet.co.za [196.31.2.163])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1CBFE37B9DE; Tue, 18 Jul 2000 00:37:59 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sheldonh@axl.ops.uunet.co.za)
Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.ops.uunet.co.za)
	by axl.ops.uunet.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.15 #1)
	id 13ERwv-000BMy-00; Tue, 18 Jul 2000 09:37:53 +0200
From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>
To: Alexander Langer <alex@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/string strsep.3 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 18 Jul 2000 08:51:29 +0200."
             <20000718085129.A2670@cichlids.cichlids.com> 
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 09:37:53 +0200
Message-ID: <43707.963905873@axl.ops.uunet.co.za>
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG



On Tue, 18 Jul 2000 08:51:29 +0200, Alexander Langer wrote:

> > Could you drop the index and rindex functions from that list?  I want to
> > discourage their use as much as possible, since they're not standard.
> 
> OK, but then I want to remove them from the others as well (I just
> adopted the list from the others, for consistency :)
> 
> Is that ok for you?

Oh yes. :-)

The only thing I can think of is that, in those cases where index(3) and
rindex(3) are listed but strchr(3) and strrchr(3) are not, you should
replace the index-related references with strchr-related references.

Ciao,
Sheldon.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message