Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:54:19 -0700 From: Sean Bruno <sbruno@miralink.com> To: Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il> Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: iscsi target failure ... Message-ID: <486901AB.2030804@miralink.com> In-Reply-To: <E1KDL1Y-000CnB-1l@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il> References: <E1KDL1Y-000CnB-1l@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Danny Braniss wrote: > Hi, > I'm trying to get the iscsi_initiator to handle errors in a better way, > and so far if if I report to the cam via XPT_DONE, with status = > CAM_REQ_ABORTED > the kernel panics after printing many > g_vfs_done():da1s1d[WRITE(offset=6428672, length=2048)]error = 5 > (the offset= changes), > so I was wandering, is there a better (CAM_REQ_CMP_ERR?) status? the return > when > a terminal error has occurred? > > danny > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-scsi > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-scsi-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Are you talking about the macro XPT_DONE() or the CAM status XPT_DONE? Also, is there a spot in the code that you are specifically looking at? Sean
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?486901AB.2030804>