From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Oct 30 20:08:54 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id UAA08296 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 20:08:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from trojanhorse.ml.org (mdean.vip.best.com [206.86.94.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA08290 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 20:08:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jamil@trojanhorse.ml.org) Received: from localhost (jamil@localhost) by trojanhorse.ml.org (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id UAA01840 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 20:08:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 20:08:41 -0800 (PST) From: "Jamil J. Weatherbee" To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Memory VS. Performance under FreeBSD Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Does anybody have any statistics on memory vs. performance as you go to large memory configurations (>64MB), also what is the biggest RAM configuration possible on a FreeBSD machine? Kind of something like: RAM for x USERS for x MEAN PROCESSES vs x DISK ACCESS