Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 9 Feb 2005 15:56:32 GMT
From:      dreams <dreams@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   misc/77308: ALTQ doesn't seem to be working on tun0
Message-ID:  <200502091556.j19FuWln019068@www.freebsd.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <200502091600.j19G0lqC002764@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

>Number:         77308
>Category:       misc
>Synopsis:       ALTQ doesn't seem to be working on tun0
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    freebsd-bugs
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Wed Feb 09 16:00:47 GMT 2005
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     dreams
>Release:        5.3-STABLE
>Organization:
>Environment:
FreeBSD localhost 5.3-STABLE FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE #10: Tue Feb  8 21:06:14 UTC 2005     root@localhost:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/MYKERNEL  i386
>Description:
I wanted to use pf+ALTQ with my ADSL connection (pppoe with ppp), everything is set up like in /usr/share/examples/pf/ackpri (using tun0 as external interface, and NAT so that another PC connected to the internal interface can access the internet), but the ack packets don't seem to be prioritized. pfctl -vsq shows some packets passing through the high priority queue (and a lot through the default queue, of course), but when the upstream is full, download speed still drops significantly. I tried tuning the bandwidth specified in the altq statement but it doens't seem to make any difference.
>How-To-Repeat:
      
>Fix:
      
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200502091556.j19FuWln019068>