From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 10 15:53:55 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D43037B401 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 15:53:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mta1.adelphia.net (mta1.adelphia.net [64.8.50.175]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC5C143FBF for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 15:53:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Support@Netflag.Net) Received: from nfn2.Netflag.Net ([68.69.240.78]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.32 201-253-122-126-132-20030307) with ESMTP id <20030610223624.QIAO1549.mta9.adelphia.net@nfn2.Netflag.Net>; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 18:36:24 -0400 Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20030610153334.00bc2c98@pop.dc3.adelphia.net> X-Sender: pedramn@pop.dc3.adelphia.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 15:36:03 -0700 To: Sean Chittenden From: Pedram Nimreezi In-Reply-To: <20030610223018.GV65470@perrin.int.nxad.com> References: <5.2.0.9.2.20030610152538.00b48be0@pop.dc3.adelphia.net> <3EE595D2.B223CA19@mindspring.com> <5.2.0.9.2.20030610152538.00b48be0@pop.dc3.adelphia.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Slow disk write speeds over network X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 22:53:55 -0000 I'm sorry I don't mean to be vague but I just get a bit tired of reading 40 posts on NFS itself... I have never once used NFS and don't see the need for it, but if one feels there is a need. Identify the causality... I need to integrate a shared medium with 100+ computers because ... 1. .... At 03:30 PM 6/10/2003 -0700, Sean Chittenden wrote: > > I'd venture to say NFS generally sucks > >[ Please stop here, do not pass go, do not collect your $200 ] > >I don't think anyone would disagree, but in terms of performance, is >there a different solution that is faster? If not, these kinds of >comments don't help this discussion. > >Open to suggestions, > Sean > >-- >Sean Chittenden >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"