From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Oct 10 23:53: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from blizzard.sabbo.net (blizzard.sabbo.net [193.193.218.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E11437B502; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 23:53:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vic.sabbo.net (root@vic.sabbo.net [193.193.218.109]) by blizzard.sabbo.net (8.9.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA15890; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:52:59 +0300 (EEST) Received: from FreeBSD.org (big_brother.vega.com [192.168.1.1]) by vic.sabbo.net (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e9B6r0F17103; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:53:00 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <39E40E48.9A62DED1@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:52:56 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Vega International Capital X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: uk,ru,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@FreeBSD.org, asami@FreeBSD.org, jdp@FreeBSD.org Subject: New ports layout slowed-down cvsup operation Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi folks, I wonder if anyone noticed that new ports layout considerably slowed down cvsup operations over a slow links. I attribute it to the fact that my checkouts.cvs file inflated almost two-fold (from 3MB to 6MB) after the change, so probably this causing slowdown, as perhaps the amount of data to be transferred increased proportionally. So the questions to beloved cvs-meisters are: am I right and if so how we could cope with this problem. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message