From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 19 22:28:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0C2D106564A for ; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 22:28:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pete@altadena.net) Received: from puffin.altadena.net (puffin.altadena.net [IPv6:2001:470:8:126::10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABA3D8FC0A for ; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 22:28:41 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=2.puffin; d=altadena.net; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Cc7E+xJEJt2GB2LNaz/u7xh3TywxsHj5EFzVyIsZzuHBl78hUBOntV+UCUCueWEyI2aAirl4heWbAUrfxmGlI7U5iptZkRzRr8fYZH96OAyD8ZSs02ZaSnJZNrT0SCYic3qBeJiDGFmaQvM32pjlQ9gevreoQBFpBqjRH9+h8lw=; Received: from [2001:470:8:126:53c:776c:42ba:4fce] (port=12097 helo=port4.altadena.net) by puffin.altadena.net with esmtps (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OQ6Wl-000BIf-Ln for stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 18:28:39 -0400 Message-ID: <4C1D4496.10403@altadena.net> Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 18:28:38 -0400 From: Pete Carah User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100217 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: if_em problems, both 7 and 8-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 22:28:42 -0000 I cannot successfully create a vlan on if_em on either releng 7 or releng 8; I have seen a patch for part of the problem (checksum offsets end up incorrect) but not all. Even turning off ALL hw_xxx flags leaves one unacceptable bug - the interface gets hard-reset any time you add or delete a vlan. I *know* that cisco uses these interfaces without these problems, so it has to be possible. I have used vlans in linux without appearing to get the same problems, though I'm not sure the rest of the configuration matches. What gives, especially since the patch for one of the problems (wrong checksum offsets) was generated about 6 months ago... We are trying to use an intel platform as a router; this is a show-stopper. I could try linux though I prefer not to... -- Pete