From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 14:41:39 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0908116A4CE for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 14:41:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from spud.vandalon.nl (clueloos.nl [195.26.8.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 130C743D1F for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 14:41:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wiebel@vandalon.nl) Received: from localhost (spud.vandalon.nl [195.26.8.146]) by spud.vandalon.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BF472802CE for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 23:41:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from by localhost (amavisd-new, port ) id Cz6VVw7C for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 23:41:39 +0100 (CET) Received: by spud.vandalon.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 04DBB27F62F; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 23:41:39 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 23:41:38 +0100 From: Joris Vandalon To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031208224138.GA41381@spud.vandalon.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at vandalon.nl Subject: Kernel panic with vlan in rc.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 22:41:39 -0000 Hi there again, Ok now with my fingers the right way on the keyboard: I encounterd something strange. when putting the following in rc.conf freebsd 5.1 AND 5.2-RC panics on ifconfig. cloned_interfaces="vlan100 vlan200 vlan300" ifconfig_vlan100="vlan 100 vlandev fxp0 172.16.0.254 netmask 255.255.255.0" ipv6_ifconfig_vlan100="3ffe:8114:2000:422::2 prefixlen 64" ifconfig_vlan200="vlan 200 vlandev fxp0 213.204.230.241 netmask 255.255.255.240 mtu 1480" ifconfig_vlan300="vlan 300 vlandev fxp0 195.149.88.57 netmask 255.255.255.252" When not creating vlans from rc.conf , but later (like in rc.local) all works fine. i've seen this on 2 diffrent boxes with 5.1 and 5.2-RC. i'm sorry I don't have anymore data to give you guys. can anyone confirm this problem ? Regards, Joris