From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 17:43:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6292416A494 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:43:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dudu@dudu.ro) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3359843D5A for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:43:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dudu@dudu.ro) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i11so336219nzh for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 09:43:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.219.9 with SMTP id w9mr9899866qbq.1164303824085; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 09:43:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.110.19 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 09:43:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:43:44 +0200 From: "Vlad Galu" To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200611231652.kANGqJsr005016@lava.sentex.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4557CECD.2000609@samsco.org> <200611130454.kAD4sZwe041556@lava.sentex.ca> <4557FF7A.8020704@samsco.org> <200611132054.kADKsFvK045726@lava.sentex.ca> <4558E3DC.6080800@samsco.org> <200611200454.kAK4sdat083568@lava.sentex.ca> <7.1.0.9.0.20061120160757.14d4a728@sentex.net> <200611220247.kAM2l9JP095066@lava.sentex.ca> <20061122130947.GM20405@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <200611231652.kANGqJsr005016@lava.sentex.ca> Cc: Subject: Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:43:51 -0000 On 11/23/06, Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 08:09 AM 11/22/2006, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > > >It would be interesting to know the real performance of Linux as a mere > >router if we want a true comparision with FreeBSD performances. > > Re-tested, this time with a LINUX UP kernel and there is not that > much difference in overall speeds. I added a few IPTABLES rules which > loaded a few of the modules. > Can you please completely remove the iptables support from your Linux configuration, as well as removing support for any packet filter in FreeBSD? Also, please enable fast_forwarding. -- If it's there, and you can see it, it's real. If it's not there, and you can see it, it's virtual. If it's there, and you can't see it, it's transparent. If it's not there, and you can't see it, you erased it.