Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 19:07:06 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r241823 - in head: . etc etc/atf etc/mtree lib lib/atf lib/atf/libatf-c lib/atf/libatf-c++ libexec libexec/atf libexec/atf/atf-check share share/atf share/doc share/doc/atf share/exampl... Message-ID: <20121022150706.GD70741@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201210220118.q9M1Ifh5098857@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201210220118.q9M1Ifh5098857@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 01:18:41AM +0000, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: M> Tinderbox breakages that are the result of this commit are entirely M> the committer's fault -- in other words: buildworld testing on amd64 M> only. Taking into account the fact that last couple of weeks head was usually not buildable rather than buildable, I strongly disappreciate this. It looks to me as we are again treating head/ as a pile of stuff, not as an operating system one can install and use. Now that we have a big choice of VCSes: svn user branches, git and perforce, why isn't it possible to settle things in private branch and only then commit them to the head/? -- Totus tuus, Glebius.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121022150706.GD70741>