From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Apr  3 20:43:23 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E696AC3
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed,  3 Apr 2013 20:43:23 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from lx@redundancy.redundancy.org)
Received: from redundancy.redundancy.org (redundancy.redundancy.org
 [IPv6:2607:f2f8:a9c4::2])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF99DE3
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed,  3 Apr 2013 20:43:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by redundancy.redundancy.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
 id CE2932FC381; Wed,  3 Apr 2013 13:43:22 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 13:43:22 -0700
From: David Thiel <lx@freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: graphics/shotwell needs a new home
Message-ID: <20130403204322.GA20813@redundancy.redundancy.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Face: %H~{$1~NOw1y#%mM6{|4:/<p]y9X%E+4%:1wo-M!re,
 zl.qH~yzbL-MWhtp$3QuKP&di/a{FOctD[FuX.\n4U*,
 M{TJg$oYp663.NyX!%H~~Tw$eR9xZU5W?1BM#t"a@'27^2x
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 20:43:23 -0000

Hello,

A year or two ago, I fixed up shotwell and took maintainership from
gnome@. Unfortunately, the build broke a month ago or so, and it needs
some love from someone much more familiar with gnomeisms to make it
functional. gnome@ has indicated they don't want it back, for which I
can't necessarily blame them.

Is there some brave soul that might be willing to adopt it?

Thanks,
David