Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 15:54:19 +0930 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Ports scheduled for removal on Nov 7 Message-ID: <20030810062419.GD83425@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <20030810062254.GA11719@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030808045334.GA97079@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030809013414.GY1741@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20030809015505.GA2522@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030809024456.GJ1741@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20030810062254.GA11719@rot13.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--C1k/k9ixf9gQZllt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday, 9 August 2003 at 23:22:54 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 12:14:56PM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > >>> So far I have: >>> >>> * mailed the maintainers >>> * force-committed to every affected port >>> * mailed to the port mailing list. >>> >>> What more do you suggest? >> >> As I said: inform the users. This might be material for >> FreeBSD-announce. It seems also reasonable to spam FreeBSD-questions >> with it. > > I think it would definitely be off-topic for freebsd-questions, but > I'd be more open to -announce. The only thing is that port removals > are a periodic event (I just happen to have more than usual queued up > this time), so if I do it this time I should do it every time. No question. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers --C1k/k9ixf9gQZllt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/NeUTIubykFB6QiMRAmdrAKCuWMR6iCIeS5A8KF2bOs/4z/27GgCeKkN9 839jGPj5+/Q59Qwfgk2VLrQ= =sKeF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --C1k/k9ixf9gQZllt--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030810062419.GD83425>