From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 12 15:33:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03FF116A4CE; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 15:33:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903AD43D41; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 15:33:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mobile.pittgoth.com (64-144-75-100.client.dsl.net [64.144.75.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by pittgoth.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j0CFXKoa058882 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:33:21 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:33:28 -0500 From: Tom Rhodes To: Gareth Hopkins Message-ID: <20050112103328.0c6288d3@mobile.pittgoth.com> In-Reply-To: <20050111190043.Y49931@gabba.so.cpt1.za.uu.net> References: <20050110190814.J49931@gabba.so.cpt1.za.uu.net> <41E3E6C3.7070801@kernel32.de> <20050111190043.Y49931@gabba.so.cpt1.za.uu.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.13 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 15:37:15 +0000 cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org cc: Jeremie Le Hen cc: Mark Murray cc: Marian Hettwer Subject: Re: MIT Kerberos and OpenSSH X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 15:33:23 -0000 On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 19:02:27 +0200 (SAST) Gareth Hopkins wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Marian Hettwer wrote: > > MH>Hej There, > MH> > MH>Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > MH>> > MH>> > MH>> I'm not a buildworld guru, but I think that with NO_KERBEROS=yes, > MH>> /usr/bin/sshd(8) will obviously NOT be linked with any krb library. > MH>not true at all. NO_KERBEROS=yes says that heimdal kerberos shouldn't be > MH>compiled, AFAIK. > MH> > MH>> IMHO, you should build OpenSSH from ports with the KERBEROS=yes knob. > MH>> > MH>that's the way I would go. > MH>However, you need to make sure that the Ports OpenSSH doesn't interfer with > MH>the Base OpenSSH. > > Howdie, > > Thanks for the replies. The reason for setting NO_KERBEROS is I do > not want heimdal kerberos built, as I want to use the MIT package. > > There must be a way to get the base system openssh to build against > the installed MIT port. Have you asked Mark Murray about this? I think he has worked with Kerberos in the base system. -- Tom Rhodes