Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 21 May 2006 20:38:03 +0400
From:      Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@mail.ru>
To:        Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: NFS safety in 6.1-RELEASE
Message-ID:  <20060521163803.GB923@hades.panopticon>
In-Reply-To: <44708B42.9050608@samsco.org>
References:  <20060521132527.GA67386@hades.panopticon> <44708B42.9050608@samsco.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Scott Long (scottl@samsco.org) wrote:
> >So I wanted to ask what's status of NFS for release - was that issue
> >fixed and is it safe to use client and server NFS on 6.1 RELEASE?
> >If there's still data corruption possible, how do I turn off the
> >attribute cache?
> 
> Dang, I meant to document that before the release, sorry.  There are two 
> variants
> that I've seen with 6.1.  One is between a Linux client and a FreeBSD 
> server.  This
> seems to be effectively fixed by using a 2.6.12 or later Linux kernel. 
My cases are 6.0 server - 6.1 client and 6.1 - 6.1

> The other is
> due to any client or server disagreeing on the precision of the 
> timestamps that are
> passed in the attributes.  This disagreement can lead to the attribue 
> cache getting
> confused and returning incorrect data to the caller.  It can be turned 
> off by either
> changing the default timeouts to 0 that are defined in the nfsclient 
> code, or by setting
> the appropriate mount options in mount_nfs as per the man page.
Thanks a lot for the help. Do I get it right that only file attributes may
be currupted, not the data itself?

-- 
Best regards,
 Dmitry                          mailto:amdmi3@mail.ru



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060521163803.GB923>