From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 28 20:49:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF9D106566B for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 20:49:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from feld.me (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 536A08FC16 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 20:49:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:From:Mime-Version:Date:References:Subject:To:Content-Type; bh=olrwkaN/h4w8VATipNCuHzH5hMu2BtOpDgQX3CZhNnE=; b=I30SNHViArBfjRYjqQ73fDlLZqBwToY1zXOqSri8aX9RuLeg0i6+JY9yeb+NkB+W9jJviBXsXI4HVxZLL2pXqYa1M5s7puSLQ7fO5mo7+3AhqwRQ5tu79UJJuvk8oHzd; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1SkLer-000LLl-Ct for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:49:46 -0500 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpa id 1340916579-94480-94479/5/74; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 20:49:39 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <4FE9B01C.30306@yandex.ru> <201206270807.23347.jhb@freebsd.org> <4FEB0079.7050008@yandex.ru> <201206271028.54477.jhb@freebsd.org> <4FEB5A3C.5050900@borderworlds.dk> <1900D4C1-E5E5-446F-ABBF-976A2DFEB36B@xcllnt.net> <4FEC22A0.9000109@freebsd.org> <4FEC2D86.2040505@freebsd.org> <8D85513D-CDFC-4D62-AA5A-F82F46E28CE5@xcllnt.net> <20120628214902.00004e34@unknown> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:49:39 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 From: Mark Felder Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20120628214902.00004e34@unknown> User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.00 (FreeBSD) X-SA-Score: -1.5 Subject: Re: [CFC/CFT] large changes in the loader(8) code X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 20:49:46 -0000 On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:49:02 -0500, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > What about multipathing? In case the disk is attached via two paths but > multipath is not enabled, the OS sees the same disk (and the same > identical unique disk identifier) multiple times. Is this a violation > of the spec too? Good point; does gmirror and gmultipath play together nicely?