From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 3 07:16:36 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA24303 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 07:16:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (fallout.campusview.indiana.edu [149.159.1.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA24289 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 07:16:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jfieber@indiana.edu) Received: from localhost (jfieber@localhost) by fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id KAA29268; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 10:16:18 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 10:16:18 -0500 (EST) From: John Fieber To: "Viren R. Shah" cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 2.2.6 for NFS server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Wed, 25 Feb 1998, John Fieber wrote: > On Wed, 25 Feb 1998, Viren R. Shah wrote: > > > 1. Is 2.2.6 close enough that we should put off installing 2.2-STABLE > > for a few days? Or in other terms, are there enough stability > > improvements in 2.2.6 that we should definitely wait for it. > > > > 2. I've seen a few mentions of NFS problems on 2.2.5. Are there any > > big gotchas wrt using a 2.2.x box as an NFS server? > > Depends on your clients. For 2.2.5, I can confirm that Solaris > and Digital Unix clients do NOT work using nfs v3. Digital Unix > works fine if you specify v2 when mounting. For the record, the latest nfs fix applied to the RELENG_2_2 branch fixes the problems I was having with Digital Unix and v3 mounts seem to be working fine. Solaris is still a problem. -john To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message