From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 12 08:42:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8626916A4FC for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 08:42:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.unicorn.cz (mail.unicorn.cz [195.250.129.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E4F443D1D for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 08:42:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andreas.kohn@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 8739 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2004 08:36:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gmx.net) (195.250.129.204) by mail.unicorn.cz with SMTP; 12 Oct 2004 08:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <416B9977.1040203@gmx.net> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:44:39 +0200 From: Andreas Kohn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jerry X-Scanned: By Symantec Anti-Virus Scan Engine References: <20041012082951.98897.qmail@web17206.mail.tpe.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20041012082951.98897.qmail@web17206.mail.tpe.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why present different size and md5 hash between the compiled code and FreeBSD's build-in binary ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 08:42:38 -0000 Jerry wrote: >Hi~ > >This is my first time to post question here, and also >I am a newbie on FreeBSD. A confusing thing I discover >is: Why the binary code I compiled(for example,telnet >command)compare with the original one is diffirent, >either size or md5 hash value, What's going on? Are >the source files differ from the FreeBSD's binary, or >something else ? >Deeply appreciate your reply, thanks ~ > >Jerry Chang > > > Hi, you might be using different optimization flags than the release building cluster. Also make sure that you have really the correct sources, and not a newer version from CVS. HTH, -- Andreas